States Sue 23andMe Over DNA Data Sales
Multiple state attorneys general have initiated legal proceedings against genetic testing company 23andMe, alleging the struggling biotech firm planned to monetize its vast database of customer DNA information as part of bankruptcy asset liquidation. The coordinated legal action represents one of the most significant challenges to genetic data privacy rights in the industry’s brief history.
The lawsuits accuse 23andMe of violating consumer protection laws by attempting to transfer sensitive genetic information to potential buyers without securing explicit customer consent for such transactions. According to New York Post, the legal challenge underscores growing public concern about how personal genetic data is handled when biotech companies face financial difficulties.
Top Lists & Life Hacks You’ll Wish You Saw Sooner
- The Richest Kardashian Revealed: 2025 Wealth Rankings
- 13 High-Paying Careers That Don’t Require a College Degree
- FBI Crime Stats Reveal America’s Most Dangerous Places in 2025

Photo Source: MoneyReign.com
The Scale of Genetic Data at Risk
23andMe has accumulated genetic profiles from more than 15 million customers since its founding, creating one of the world’s largest privately held databases of human DNA information. This treasure trove includes not only raw genetic sequences but also associated health data, ancestry information, and family connections that customers provided when using the company’s services. The database represents an unprecedented collection of personal biological information that could prove valuable to pharmaceutical companies, research institutions, and other commercial interests.
State prosecutors argue that customers provided their genetic material with the understanding that it would be used for specific purposes outlined in the company’s privacy policies, not sold to unknown third parties as part of bankruptcy proceedings. The legal challenge contends that such transfers would fundamentally alter the original agreement between the company and its customers regarding data usage and protection.
Financial Troubles and Asset Liquidation
23andMe’s financial difficulties have mounted over recent quarters as consumer interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing has declined and the company has struggled to develop sustainable revenue streams beyond initial testing fees. The genetic testing market has become increasingly crowded with competitors, while regulatory scrutiny has intensified regarding health claims and data security practices.
Company executives have explored various options for generating revenue from their extensive genetic database, including partnerships with pharmaceutical companies for drug development research. According to Reuters, these efforts have failed to generate sufficient income to address the company’s mounting financial obligations, leading to consideration of more drastic monetization strategies.
Legal Arguments and Privacy Rights
The state lawsuits focus on allegations that 23andMe violated consumer protection statutes by failing to adequately inform customers about potential data transfer scenarios during bankruptcy proceedings. Prosecutors argue that the company’s original privacy policies and terms of service did not sufficiently disclose the possibility that genetic information could be sold to third parties under any circumstances.
Legal experts note that genetic information represents a uniquely sensitive category of personal data that reveals intimate details about individuals and their family members, including predispositions to various health conditions and ancestry information. The permanent and hereditary nature of genetic data makes unauthorized transfers particularly problematic from a privacy rights perspective, as the information affects not only current customers but also their relatives and future generations.

Photo Source: MoneyReign.com
Industry-Wide Implications
The 23andMe case has prompted renewed scrutiny of data governance practices across the genetic testing industry, as regulators and consumer advocates question whether existing privacy protections are adequate for such sensitive information. Other companies in the space are reviewing their own data handling policies and bankruptcy procedures to avoid similar legal challenges should they face financial difficulties.
The controversy has also highlighted the need for clearer regulatory frameworks governing genetic data ownership and transfer rights. According to CNN, some consumer advocates are calling for federal legislation that would establish specific protections for genetic information and require explicit consent for any data transfers, regardless of the circumstances facing the collecting company.
The outcome of the state lawsuits against 23andMe could establish important precedents for how genetic data is treated in corporate bankruptcy proceedings and what rights customers retain over their biological information. As the genetic testing industry continues to evolve and face economic pressures, these legal questions will likely become increasingly important for both companies and consumers seeking to understand their rights and obligations regarding personal genetic data.
Trending Tips & Lists You’ll Kick Yourself for Missing