Cramer Lauds Trump’s ‘Pragmatic’ China Trade Approach
CNBC’s Jim Cramer publicly praised President Donald Trump’s recent trade negotiations with China, describing the administration’s approach as “pragmatic” and “business-oriented” during Monday’s broadcast. The veteran financial commentator’s remarks came in response to the weekend announcement of a pause in tariff escalations between the world’s two largest economies, according to The Hill.
Cramer’s comments surprised some viewers and even appeared to catch his CNBC colleagues off guard, as he has occasionally been critical of certain administration policies in the past. The financial host emphasized that the market-positive developments deserved recognition regardless of political affiliations.

Unexpected Endorsement Surprises Colleagues
During a segment analyzing market reactions to the trade announcement, Cramer directly addressed the effectiveness of the administration’s negotiating tactics. “I’ve got to salute the president’s pragmatism here,” Cramer said. “This is exactly what the business community has been hoping for — a deal-oriented approach rather than ideological confrontation.”
The comment visibly surprised CNBC anchor David Faber, who responded with a raised eyebrow and “Really, Jim?” before Cramer continued his analysis. The exchange highlighted the sometimes unpredictable nature of Cramer’s commentary, which often cuts across typical political lines when evaluating market impacts.
Media analyst Brian Steinberg told Mediaite that Cramer’s willingness to praise policies regardless of political origin has been a consistent aspect of his broadcasting approach. “Cramer evaluates policies through a market lens first and foremost, which sometimes puts him at odds with expected positions,” Steinberg explained.
Market-Focused Analysis
Cramer elaborated on his position by highlighting specific benefits of the trade agreement for investors and businesses. He noted that the pause in tariff escalations provides much-needed certainty for companies with significant exposure to China, allowing for more confident capital allocation decisions.
“What matters to the market is predictability, and this move delivers exactly that,” Cramer explained. “Companies can now plan supply chains, investments, and strategic initiatives with greater confidence about the rules of the game.”
The CNBC host identified several sectors likely to benefit most directly from improved trade relations, including semiconductor manufacturers, agricultural producers, and luxury goods companies with significant Chinese consumer exposure. These observations aligned with Monday’s market movements, as stocks in these sectors generally outperformed broader indexes.
Historical Context of Trade Tensions
Providing context for his analysis, Cramer reviewed the evolution of U.S.-China trade relations over recent years. He noted that the relationship had experienced significant volatility, with multiple rounds of tariffs and counter-tariffs creating uncertainty for global markets and supply chains.
“We’ve been through years of unpredictable escalations and temporary truces,” Cramer said. “What’s different this time is the comprehensive nature of the agreement and the clear path forward it establishes for resolving remaining disputes.”
International trade experts from Brookings Institution have similarly noted that the current agreement represents a potential inflection point in the relationship between the two economic superpowers, though significant structural issues remain unresolved.
Criticism of Previous Approaches
While praising the current direction, Cramer didn’t hesitate to criticize aspects of previous trade policies from both Republican and Democratic administrations. He argued that earlier approaches had often prioritized political messaging over practical economic outcomes.
“For too long, we’ve had trade policy driven by talking points rather than results,” Cramer said. “What businesses and markets need is exactly what we’re seeing now — pragmatic solutions that address legitimate concerns while keeping commerce flowing.”
The financial host acknowledged ongoing challenges in the U.S.-China relationship but emphasized that decoupling the world’s two largest economies was neither realistic nor desirable from a market perspective.

Investment Implications
Concluding his analysis, Cramer offered specific investment guidance related to the trade developments. He suggested that the agreement creates opportunities in companies with significant Chinese market exposure that had been previously discounted due to geopolitical concerns.
“Smart investors should be looking at quality names that were beaten down primarily due to China exposure,” Cramer advised. “We’re talking about companies like Apple, Nike, and Starbucks that derive substantial revenue from Chinese consumers.”
Cramer emphasized that while he was positive on the trade developments, investors should remain selective and focus on companies with strong fundamentals rather than simply buying any stock with Chinese business interests.
“This agreement doesn’t fix every problem,” he concluded. “But it represents the kind of pragmatic approach that markets can work with, and that deserves recognition regardless of your political leanings.”